TM reader rrcarlson12 posted some pics of the ViseGrip locking pliers above to the TM photo pool. He writes: “They have a patent date of 1942 and don’t have a separate release lever. But these weren’t made by Irwin, who released a similar model within the last few years as stated in the post on CH Hanson locking pliers.”
Indeed! The “new” Irwin ViseGrips without a release lever seem to work pretty much the same way as the ones pictured. (Check the photo pool for additional photos, including some closeups of the mechanism.) As far as I can tell the only major difference between the modern ones and the WWII-era pliers are the thermo-plastic rubber overmolds.
Of course, what I don’t get is why more tool companies don’t point out this heritage. Seriously, there’s nothing in the world wrong with recognizing a good thing from the past and bringing it back. Good ideas combined with modern materials and manufacturing technology make for some of the most kick-ass tools available. We’ve suggested for some time that companies like Stanley, Irwin, and others — those who have long histories and have recently bought/absorbed other companies that have long histories — should keep that heritage front and center. Bring back some of the “old” products (with modern upgrades, of course) and tell us how they built the future upon which we stand.
1942 Release Lever-less ViseGrips [TM Flickr Pool]
Modern “Fast Release” ViseGrip Locking Pliers [What’s This?]
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
9 Responses to Back to the Future: Lever-less ViseGrips From 1942
Leave a Reply
TM on Flickr
![RICH-CON No. 2 [shows Logo on side of plane]](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7236/7230831382_240f44f2f4_s.jpg)
Recent Comments
{ Just grind the sides of an extender to the proprietary leatherman shape (actually a flattened 1/4"hex)and you can use standard bits (at standard prices) in... } – May 23, 6:37 AM
{ Oxy-gasoline cutting torch, alternative to acetylene cutting torch } – May 23, 2:53 AM
{ Undeniably imagine that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be at the internet the simplest factor to consider of. I say to you,... } – May 22, 11:55 PM
{ Wow the third design is cool. In fact all of them are cool
. Kinda helped me to generate some ideas. } – May 22, 11:40 PM{ What did you do about the glass surfaces on the limbs? Did you sand and refinish them as well, and if so, what did you... } – May 22, 9:48 PM
As someone who grew up with Vise-Grips without the release lever, I’ll take the ones with the release lever anytime. I recall many pinched fingers while trying to get the grip to release.
Is Petersen Manufacturing so soon to be forgotten?
My guess is that Petersen Manufacturing tools will not be forgotten, because good tools survive, and their reputation grows.
Of course Irwin is just a subsidiary of Newell-Rubbermaid – so big fish eat little fish applued to them as well
well I am sure we just read a post last week about vise grips
comparing old to new
but I do agree the heritage should be remembered
stanley themselves have a huge history most of which is lost save for what you find at flea markets and garage sales
I have one of those lever-less old Vise-grips I got from my late father-in-law’s estate. I think mine’s a No. 10 as well.
I thought it was supposed to have a lever, but it must have gotten lost, but no, it’s exactly like the one pictured. I’ll have to check it out and see if there’s a date on it.
I recall my dad having a set like these and having to use a screwdriver to pry the handles open, at which point they usually went flying across the room. Dad wasn’t one to spend money needlessly but he did replace these with a levered pair at some point and these remained in the bottom drawer … until another levered set showed up and the old ones disappeared. Progress is good!
I also have a similar tool that was my father’s. The ViceGrip logo is not on the tool, but the release handle has a 1940′s patent date and is stamped “Vice-Grip DeWitte, NEBR.”
@Dick, Either you have a knock off of the real thing or your bifocals need adjustment, because the genuine article would be stamped “Vise-Grip”, not “Vice-Grip”, and “DeWitt”, not “DeWitte”. Just sayin’.