<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Glove Box For Your Tool Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Magnetic Inspection Glove Holder &#124; TekPicks</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-626209</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnetic Inspection Glove Holder &#124; TekPicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-626209</guid>
		<description>[...] Wicked simply and useful. Evidence inspection is a dirty business so we go through dozens of gloves each month. Now we have a great way to keep our supply organized and right where they are needed. The dispenser can attach to any metal surface and has a spring loader holder to accommodate most boxes. [Via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wicked simply and useful. Evidence inspection is a dirty business so we go through dozens of gloves each month. Now we have a great way to keep our supply organized and right where they are needed. The dispenser can attach to any metal surface and has a spring loader holder to accommodate most boxes. [Via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hjablomy</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-619210</link>
		<dc:creator>hjablomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-619210</guid>
		<description>Ferromagnetic = strong attraction
Paramagnetic = weak attraction
Diamagnetic = repulsion

Can't truly believe that someone was having a semantic argument about this subject, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferromagnetic = strong attraction<br />
Paramagnetic = weak attraction<br />
Diamagnetic = repulsion</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t truly believe that someone was having a semantic argument about this subject, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-619147</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-619147</guid>
		<description>Geeze,  

If we as tool users don't understand what he meant, maybe it's time we put the tools down, and stepped away. After all when he stated "US General and Lisle sell competing magnetic glove dispensers that you can attach to any metal surface." were we supposed to think they had discovered a new type of magnet? I can't speak for the rest, but I got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeze,  </p>
<p>If we as tool users don&#8217;t understand what he meant, maybe it&#8217;s time we put the tools down, and stepped away. After all when he stated &#8220;US General and Lisle sell competing magnetic glove dispensers that you can attach to any metal surface.&#8221; were we supposed to think they had discovered a new type of magnet? I can&#8217;t speak for the rest, but I got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Coot</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-619133</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Coot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-619133</guid>
		<description>To heck with that weird magnetic stuff, just smear some Shoe Goo on it and stick it wherever you want :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To heck with that weird magnetic stuff, just smear some Shoe Goo on it and stick it wherever you want <img src='http://toolmonger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamen Johnson</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-619121</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamen Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-619121</guid>
		<description>Thanks Zathrus,

I did a little research after your post and found a good explanation of the classification system for magnetic materials.  Here's a good link:

http://books.google.com/books?id=axyWXjsdorMC&#38;pg=RA1-PA89&#38;lpg=RA1-PA89&#38;dq=classification+of+magnetic+materials&#38;source=web&#38;ots=fVnh046hiH&#38;sig=sG1twqYROrBvnai07mTZ_UM4wQI&#38;hl=en&#38;sa=X&#38;oi=book_result&#38;resnum=3&#38;ct=result

I think you're right on with the term magnetic, but paramagnetic doesn't really seem to be the correct term.  Paramagnetic materials are very weakly attracted.  An example would be aluminum.

To be technically correct a magnet can stick to materials in the set of [paramagnetic, magnetic].  From now on I'll just say something like

"... attach to the surface of any magnetic material."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Zathrus,</p>
<p>I did a little research after your post and found a good explanation of the classification system for magnetic materials.  Here&#8217;s a good link:</p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=axyWXjsdorMC&amp;pg=RA1-PA89&amp;lpg=RA1-PA89&amp;dq=classification+of+magnetic+materials&amp;source=web&amp;ots=fVnh046hiH&amp;sig=sG1twqYROrBvnai07mTZ_UM4wQI&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ct=result" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=axyWXjsdorMC&amp;pg=RA1-PA89&amp;lpg=RA1-PA89&amp;dq=classification+of+magnetic+materials&amp;source=web&amp;ots=fVnh046hiH&amp;sig=sG1twqYROrBvnai07mTZ_UM4wQI&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ct=result</a></p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right on with the term magnetic, but paramagnetic doesn&#8217;t really seem to be the correct term.  Paramagnetic materials are very weakly attracted.  An example would be aluminum.</p>
<p>To be technically correct a magnet can stick to materials in the set of [paramagnetic, magnetic].  From now on I&#8217;ll just say something like</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; attach to the surface of any magnetic material.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zathrus</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-619091</link>
		<dc:creator>Zathrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-619091</guid>
		<description>Benjamen,

The proper technical term is "paramagnetic".

That said, if you don't know that some metals (stainless steel, aluminum) are not magnetic (also a correct term) then, please, put the tools down and step away. You apparently weren't listening in 4th grade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamen,</p>
<p>The proper technical term is &#8220;paramagnetic&#8221;.</p>
<p>That said, if you don&#8217;t know that some metals (stainless steel, aluminum) are not magnetic (also a correct term) then, please, put the tools down and step away. You apparently weren&#8217;t listening in 4th grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-618842</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-618842</guid>
		<description>Yeah!  What about all my 316 stainless steel toolboxes?  Oh wait.  I don't have any of those.  I do have some 316 ss screws tho.  But I guess I wouldn't be attaching a box of nitrile gloves to them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!  What about all my 316 stainless steel toolboxes?  Oh wait.  I don&#8217;t have any of those.  I do have some 316 ss screws tho.  But I guess I wouldn&#8217;t be attaching a box of nitrile gloves to them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamen Johnson</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-618752</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamen Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-618752</guid>
		<description>OK any metal surface is Harbor Freights claim, not mine.  You'll find it very common in marketing literature.  I just got a little lazy today.

Seriously, if you're going to complain give me a word that means a magnet will stick to it.  I've used ferrous in the past grudgingly because magnets won't stick to some ferrous metals -- some grades of stainless -- while they'll also stick to some non-ferrous surfaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK any metal surface is Harbor Freights claim, not mine.  You&#8217;ll find it very common in marketing literature.  I just got a little lazy today.</p>
<p>Seriously, if you&#8217;re going to complain give me a word that means a magnet will stick to it.  I&#8217;ve used ferrous in the past grudgingly because magnets won&#8217;t stick to some ferrous metals &#8212; some grades of stainless &#8212; while they&#8217;ll also stick to some non-ferrous surfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/10/13/a-glove-box-for-your-tool-box/#comment-618732</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/?p=13980#comment-618732</guid>
		<description>Any metal surface? Really guys? Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any metal surface? Really guys? Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
