<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight-Line Floor Sander</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hicinbothem</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-373032</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hicinbothem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-373032</guid>
		<description>&#62;Would something like this work well on a deck surface of pressure 
&#62;treated 2×6s? Or is it meant more for indoor flooring?

Aerosolizing PT lumber is a REALLY bad idea, even outdoors and with the newest non-arsenate lumber.  Even with the catch bag you'll spread arsenic- or copper-contaminated dust all over the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Would something like this work well on a deck surface of pressure<br />
&gt;treated 2×6s? Or is it meant more for indoor flooring?</p>
<p>Aerosolizing PT lumber is a REALLY bad idea, even outdoors and with the newest non-arsenate lumber.  Even with the catch bag you&#8217;ll spread arsenic- or copper-contaminated dust all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-372937</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-372937</guid>
		<description>I think my floor finishing sub uses Clarke sanders - and some high-powered vacuums to collect dust. I recall him saying that the collection bags on most sanders are just a step up from worthless. I also recall seeing some new machines that claim to control dust a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my floor finishing sub uses Clarke sanders - and some high-powered vacuums to collect dust. I recall him saying that the collection bags on most sanders are just a step up from worthless. I also recall seeing some new machines that claim to control dust a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbb</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-372923</link>
		<dc:creator>rbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2008/06/30/straight-line-floor-sander/#comment-372923</guid>
		<description>Would something like this work well on a deck surface of pressure treated 2x6s?  Or is it meant more for indoor flooring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would something like this work well on a deck surface of pressure treated 2&#215;6s?  Or is it meant more for indoor flooring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
