<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preview: Metabo&#8217;s One-Piece Rotary Hammer Core Bit</title>
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/11/06/preview-metabos-one-piece-rotary-hammer-core-bit/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nate Bezanson</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/11/06/preview-metabos-one-piece-rotary-hammer-core-bit/#comment-142356</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toolmonger.com/2007/11/06/preview-metabos-one-piece-rotary-hammer-core-bit/#comment-142356</guid>
					<description>More efficient, you say? I always wondered how much of the tool's effort got frittered away in joint play, between the shank and the bit. Judging by how firmly wedged that joint got, I assume not very much! But beating the crap out of the bit to free the shank so it could be used with a different bit was a ritual I didn't look forward to.

Of course, buying a second shank would've been the obvious answer, and the total cost probably would've been similar to a set of one-piece bits, too. Come to think of it, storing disassembled bits and shanks probably takes less room than the one-piece style, so I'm gonna say these are ideal only in situations where the tool spends more time out of its case than tucked away. 

Of course, the one-piece bits could turn out cheaper than the mix-and-match style, so perhaps they'll be attractive to the casual market too. Wait and see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More efficient, you say? I always wondered how much of the tool&#8217;s effort got frittered away in joint play, between the shank and the bit. Judging by how firmly wedged that joint got, I assume not very much! But beating the crap out of the bit to free the shank so it could be used with a different bit was a ritual I didn&#8217;t look forward to.</p>
<p>Of course, buying a second shank would&#8217;ve been the obvious answer, and the total cost probably would&#8217;ve been similar to a set of one-piece bits, too. Come to think of it, storing disassembled bits and shanks probably takes less room than the one-piece style, so I&#8217;m gonna say these are ideal only in situations where the tool spends more time out of its case than tucked away. </p>
<p>Of course, the one-piece bits could turn out cheaper than the mix-and-match style, so perhaps they&#8217;ll be attractive to the casual market too. Wait and see!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
