<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engineer&#8217;s Squares: Accurate And Easy On The Eyes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Carter</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-63028</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-63028</guid>
		<description>That's why I have a square to .0002" 3x3x4 Suburban angle plate, an 18"x18" AA Doall Surface plate and a set (used and somewhat worn but still very accurate) of P&#38;W gage blocks. Plus all the mics, a good swiss .0001" test indicator, etc, etc. The Starrett Vernier Protractor is pretty handy as well.

But those are for the extreme precision situations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I have a square to .0002&#8243; 3&#215;3x4 Suburban angle plate, an 18&#8243;x18&#8243; AA Doall Surface plate and a set (used and somewhat worn but still very accurate) of P&amp;W gage blocks. Plus all the mics, a good swiss .0001&#8243; test indicator, etc, etc. The Starrett Vernier Protractor is pretty handy as well.</p>
<p>But those are for the extreme precision situations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62962</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62962</guid>
		<description>Nick,

Speaking from painful experience, it's like many other things. Better to have more precision than you need than not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Speaking from painful experience, it&#8217;s like many other things. Better to have more precision than you need than not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Carter</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62712</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62712</guid>
		<description>.0005" per inch is ok for a 2" square, but for a 6" (.003" out) or 8" (.004" out) and up it's really only good for woodworking &#38; welding. You ideally want under .001" over the total length, if not .0005" total for precision work, especially when aligning machines and setting up work.

Borwn and Sharpe (although an old US brand, they are likely imported) has a 3 piece set that is good to .0006" for about $53.00 from Enco.

It all depends on how much precision you need...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.0005&#8243; per inch is ok for a 2&#8243; square, but for a 6&#8243; (.003&#8243; out) or 8&#8243; (.004&#8243; out) and up it&#8217;s really only good for woodworking &amp; welding. You ideally want under .001&#8243; over the total length, if not .0005&#8243; total for precision work, especially when aligning machines and setting up work.</p>
<p>Borwn and Sharpe (although an old US brand, they are likely imported) has a 3 piece set that is good to .0006&#8243; for about $53.00 from Enco.</p>
<p>It all depends on how much precision you need&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62638</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/05/08/engineers-squares-accurate-and-easy-on-the-eyes/#comment-62638</guid>
		<description>Growing up my dad (retired machinist) always had these, but I have been too cheap to get my own set. This is not that bad of a price. I might just raid some from my dads garage though. I hope he doesn't read this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growing up my dad (retired machinist) always had these, but I have been too cheap to get my own set. This is not that bad of a price. I might just raid some from my dads garage though. I hope he doesn&#8217;t read this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
