<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finds: Dynomation Professional Engine Simulation Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmonger.com/2007/03/04/finds-dynomation-professional-engine-simulation-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/03/04/finds-dynomation-professional-engine-simulation-software/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nrChris</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/03/04/finds-dynomation-professional-engine-simulation-software/#comment-29539</link>
		<dc:creator>nrChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/03/04/finds-dynomation-professional-engine-simulation-software/#comment-29539</guid>
		<description>It is amazing what you can do with software, but I would be really interested to see a comparison of the theoretical values as calculated by the software versus an engine built from those components. And revisit it after some decent real world use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing what you can do with software, but I would be really interested to see a comparison of the theoretical values as calculated by the software versus an engine built from those components. And revisit it after some decent real world use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
