jump to example.com

post-multi-vise.jpg

xanax online no prescription

Dremel keeps punching out great accessories for their already-ubiquitous rotary tool — like their new “multi-vise.”  Think of it as a bigger, beefier version of the “third-hand” style vises you use for electronics work.

buy ambien online without prescription

It has the same swivel-type base — which is removable to allow you to sit the unit on a bench directly — but its padded jaws can handle heavier objects. 

buy provigil online

The base will clamp to any bench up to 2-1/2″ thick and rotates 360 degrees while tilting up to 50 degrees, allowing you to lock your work in a good position. 

buy klonopin no prescription

This should hit shelves in March, and Dremel says it’ll retail for around $35.

tramadol for salebuy soma online no prescription buy valium online no prescription buy ultram no prescription alprazolam online no prescription buy adipex without prescription buy diazepam online without prescription buy ativan online no prescription zolpidem online pharmacy buy phentermine online no prescription
 

9 Responses to Preview: Dremel’s Multi-Vise

  1. Paul says:

    Hobby vises can be handy, not nearly as handy as big metal vises are, but handy none the less. I am a man of many vices myself. I have a Panavise for my hobby vise. And a Record Quick Vise too, as an intermediate lightweight vise. I paid $5 for the Record Quick Vise at a flea market a couple of years back now. Then one of them cheap, clamp it to a 2×4 types of vises. Believe it or not that 2×4 vise sees more action than the other two put together.

    I can use that 2×4 vise as a clamp, a stop, a holder, or a vise.

    Trying to find an example of my vise I ran across this:
    http://www.web-tronics.com/unclvih.html

    This isn’t like what I have but I think it is a good deal.

    This is the style of mine. but mine is a much bigger piece of junk. Mine has like an aluminum body and stuff. I doubt I paid much more than $3 for my 2×4 vise.

    http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/photos/93500-93599/93517.gif

    These are really handy. I still like my big bench mounted metal vises the best through.

  2. nrChris says:

    Not to be negative, but the Dremel stuff that I have used lately (Planer, plunge router attachment and drill press) have all been of a quality that I cannot say matches that of the rotary tools themselves. Some of it is plastic junk, particularly the press. They even look the part to some extent.

    I dunno, I would buy a machinists vice or a couple of third hand tools before I would even consider this. My $0.02.

  3. Rob says:

    If this turns out to be a decent tool, I’d snap one up. It’s quite a bit less than the Panavise I really want to get.

  4. Eric G says:

    Go with the Panavise, you will not be disappointed, especially if you do any electronics work. The additional heads for circuit board holding make it a much more flexible choice and the build quality is very high.

  5. Don says:

    I think irwin has a very similar vice that uses their quick clamp bar clamp. I have one and it works very well. I don’t see much difference between this and that. I’m pretty sure the irwin vice was also about half the price.

  6. Dan says:

    Dremel products are disappointing pieces of junk in my opinion. Not well thought out. They might look nice, but as a useful tool… they are garbage.

  7. Satinder says:

    I prase the paul forgings Bench Vise which is similarly to Record shifield
    England and their cross & tapper rib vises.Thanks to mighty for their
    good vise they manufature in india.

  8. Bob says:

    Paul have intoduces new product T Bar Clamp sash Bar clamp

  9. Bob says:

    If you want to buy good quality Sash bar Or T bar clamp than you go
    to the website of http://www.paulforgings.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>