<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finds: Radon Test Kits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmonger.com/2007/01/06/finds-radon-test-kits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/01/06/finds-radon-test-kits/</link>
	<description>All tools. All the time.  Your source for news, information, and reviews of hand tools, power tools, and tools of all kinds.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Myself</title>
		<link>http://toolmonger.com/2007/01/06/finds-radon-test-kits/#comment-11830</link>
		<dc:creator>Myself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmonger.com/2007/01/06/finds-radon-test-kits/#comment-11830</guid>
		<description>Charcoal canisters are a decent short-term test, but they're not tremendously accurate. If you can remember to send in an Alpha-track after 6 months, the results are more accurate and they're just as cheap as charcoal cans.

Neither of the above are suitable in a real-estate transaction of course, where the homeowner has incentive to tamper with the test and make sure it produces a nice low result. In such cases, you want a "continuous radon monitor" which also records temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, and movement. If someone carries it outside or opens the windows for 40 of the 48 hours, you'll see it on the results! CRMs go for a few grand, so just have your home inspector use his.

As for testing your own home, yes, charcoal cans are a great way to start. Hit http://www.epa.gov/radon/ for more info. Do it now! What you don't know can irradiate you. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charcoal canisters are a decent short-term test, but they&#8217;re not tremendously accurate. If you can remember to send in an Alpha-track after 6 months, the results are more accurate and they&#8217;re just as cheap as charcoal cans.</p>
<p>Neither of the above are suitable in a real-estate transaction of course, where the homeowner has incentive to tamper with the test and make sure it produces a nice low result. In such cases, you want a &#8220;continuous radon monitor&#8221; which also records temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, and movement. If someone carries it outside or opens the windows for 40 of the 48 hours, you&#8217;ll see it on the results! CRMs go for a few grand, so just have your home inspector use his.</p>
<p>As for testing your own home, yes, charcoal cans are a great way to start. Hit <a href="http://www.epa.gov/radon/" rel="nofollow">http://www.epa.gov/radon/</a> for more info. Do it now! What you don&#8217;t know can irradiate you. <img src='http://toolmonger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
